Gavern
2005-03-04 05:10:24 UTC
I've always wondered just how many people WOULD subscribe to Foxtel if
their basic subscription prices were halved.
When you consider it's what.. $50-60 a month on a 2 year contract for
something that some of us would only need for 16 or so days of the year
(ok.. more if you add the WSBK).. how many subscribers are Fox missing
out on because of the price....?
Now, if they had a basic sub of $25-30 a month, I know a LOT of people
would just right on for their 2 year contract.
For now I am happy to pay the equivalent of (less than) one month Poxtel
sub to access MotoGP website and download the races "for the nights that
I'm not allowed to stay up".. and watch it a couple of hours before TEN
show it.
miss out on the WSBKs though....:(
Anyone reckon that if they halved the price then they would at least
double the subs..??
their basic subscription prices were halved.
When you consider it's what.. $50-60 a month on a 2 year contract for
something that some of us would only need for 16 or so days of the year
(ok.. more if you add the WSBK).. how many subscribers are Fox missing
out on because of the price....?
Now, if they had a basic sub of $25-30 a month, I know a LOT of people
would just right on for their 2 year contract.
For now I am happy to pay the equivalent of (less than) one month Poxtel
sub to access MotoGP website and download the races "for the nights that
I'm not allowed to stay up".. and watch it a couple of hours before TEN
show it.
miss out on the WSBKs though....:(
Anyone reckon that if they halved the price then they would at least
double the subs..??